Purpose : This paper aimed to analyze studies on sustainable development goals (SDGs), specifically within the domains of economics, management, and business. The primary objective of the study was to explain how scholars could effectively identify essential contributions, prominent countries, significant organizations, and potential avenues for future research in these fields.

Methodology : The bibliometric analysis was performed using the esteemed Web of Science database, and the necessary information was saved as a tab-delimited text file. Advanced tools such as the JAVA-based VOSviewer software were used to analyze co-authorships, co-occurrences, bibliographic coupling, citation, and co-citation analysis.

Findings : The topic of sustainable development goals garnered significant attention, as evidenced by the rise in research publications over the past five years. The highest number of publications was recorded in 2023.

Practical Implications : Several network studies revealed promising avenues for additional research in the business sector concerning the SDGs. The study enabled interested researchers to make significant contributions in this field.

Originality : This study provided a novel perspective for doing a more exact and accurate analysis within the domains of business, management, and economics in relation to the SDGs.

1. Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z., & Baharun, R. (2020). Research trends of neuromarketing: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948–2962. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343680835
2. Arnaboldi, V., Dunbar, R. I., Passarella, A., & Conti, M. (2016). Analysis of co-authorship ego networks. In A. Wierzbicki, U. Brandes, F. Schweitzer, & D. Pedreschi (eds.) Advances in network science. NetSci-X 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 9564, pp. 82–96). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28361-6_7
3. Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L. H., Mumford, K. J., & Oleson, K. (2012). Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environment and Development Economics, 17(3), 317–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000137
4. Bonilla, C. A., Merigó, J. M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Economics in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1747-7
5. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
6. Chen, M.-C., Chen, S.-H., Cheng, C.-D., Chung, C.-H., Mau, L.-P., Sung, C.-E., Weng, P.-W., Cathy Tsai, Y.-W., Shieh, Y.-S., Huang, R.-Y., & Cheng, W.-C. (2023). Mapping out the bibliometric characteristics of classic articles published in a Taiwanese academic journal in dentistry: A Scopus-based analysis. Journal of Dental Sciences, 18(4), 1493–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2023.03.015
7. Doulani, A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis and science mapping of scientific publications of Alzahra University during 1986–2019. Library Hi Tech, 39(4), 915–935. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2020-0131
8. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
9. Fleming, A., Wise, R. M., Hansen, H., & Sams, L. (2017). The sustainable development goals: A case study. Marine Policy, 86, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.019
10. Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140304
11. Harsanto, B., & Firmansyah, E. A. (2023). A twenty years bibliometric analysis (2002–2021) of business economics research in ASEAN. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), Article ID 2194467. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2194467
12. Huang, Y., Xu, C., Zhang, X., & Li, L. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of landslide research based on the WOS database. Natural Hazards Research, 2(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2022.02.001
13. Jamali, D., Barkemeyer, R., Samara, G., & Markovic, S. (2022). The SDGs: A change agenda shaping the future of business and humanity at large. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(4), 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12483
14. Kateja, A., & Medatwal, P. (2024). Environmental sustainability: Scrutinizing the state of states. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 13(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2024/v13i1/173412
15. Kraus, S., Li, H., Kang, Q., Westhead, P., & Tiberius, V. (2020). The sharing economy: A bibliometric analysis of the state-of-the-art. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(8), 1769–1786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438
16. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
17. Li, W., Chen, X., Xie, L., Liu, Z., & Xiong, X. (2019). Bioelectrochemical systems for groundwater remediation: The development trend and research front revealed by bibliometric analysis. Water, 11(8), 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081532
18. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
19. Merigo, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
20. Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional De La Información, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
21. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
22. Patra, S. K., Bhattacharya, P., & Verma, N. (2006). Bibliometric study of literature on bibliometrics. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 26(1), 27–32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279273535
23. Rashmi, K., Kataria, A., & Singh, R. (2021). Work-life balance: A review and future research agenda. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(2), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i2/157690
24. Rathi, S., & Kumar, P. (2023). Work-life balance and work-life conflict: A bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(8), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i8/173064
25. Reddy, J. S., Sharma, R., & Gupta, A. K. (2023). Trends and future directions of accreditations in higher education: Bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(6), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i6/172863
26. Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers. Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24108
27. Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
28. Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0
29. Sardana, V., Mohapatra, A. K., Singh, A. K., & Singhania, S. (2023). Unveiling insurance and risk management insights through bibliometric and cluster analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(11), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i11/173213
30. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
31. Swain, R. B., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Achieving sustainable development goals: Predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(2), 96–106.
32. Tariyal, P. (2017). A study on intersectoral linkages in Indian economy. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 6(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2017/v6i1/111020
33. Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Bates, B. J., Levine, K. J., King, D. W., Birch, B., Mays, R., & Caldwell, C. (2011). Perceived value of scholarly articles. Learned Publishing, 24(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110207
34. Wang, B., Pan, S.-Y., Ke, R.-Y., Wang, K., & Wei, Y.-M. (2014). An overview of climate change vulnerability: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 1649–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1260-y
35. Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, J., Viney, I., Wouters, P., Hill, J., & Johnson, B. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. HEFCEmetrics. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
36. Wren, J. D. (2005). Open access and openly accessible: A study of scientific publications shared via the internet. BMJ, 330(7500), 1128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38422.611736.E0