In 1996, two economists, and in 2001, three economists, were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics by the Royal Academy of Sciences of Sweden for their revolutionary contributions to asymmetric information. The contribution of the first predecessor of asymmetric information was neither cited/quoted nor acknowledged by at least one of the five Nobel laureate economists in their works. This is a curious neglect of Cicero as the first predecessor of the concept of asymmetric information by the five Nobel laureate economists. Hence, Stigler's Law of Eponymy : "No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer" (Stigler, 1980, p. 147) is also applicable to Cicero. The objectives of this article were four-fold: (a) to disclose the name of the earliest predecessor of the concept of asymmetric information : Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC), who was an ancient Roman Stoic philosopher, (b) to disclose how Cicero described the informational asymmetry between the sellers and buyers of the markets in terms of the different examples of economic exchange or transaction by "few words, with gentleness and efficiency," (c) how Cicero has elevated the discussion of asymmetric information from positive to normative or moral perspective, which can be found in his treatise, entitled, De Officiis (44 BC), whose English translation is On Duties and (d) to indicate that the concept of adverse selection, which is one of the problems of asymmetric information, was first coined by the Chicago university economist Carlos C. Closson in the article "Social selection" in 1896.

1. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(January), 3-9.
2. Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Ackoff’s best. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
3. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
4. Baloglou, C. P. (2012). The tradition of economic thought in the Mediterranean world from the ancient classical times through the Hellenistic times until the Byzantine times and Arab-Islamic world. In J. G. Backhaus (ed.), Handbook of the history of economic thought (pp. 7-91). New York : Springer.
5. Beckert, J., & Wehinger, F. (2013). In the shadow: Illegal markets and economic sociology. Socio-Economic Review, 11(1), 5-30.
6. Bellinger, G., Castro, D., & Mills, A. (n.d.). Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm target="_blank">http://www.systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm</a>
7. Closson, C. C. (1896). Social selection. Journal of Political Economy, 4(4), 449-466.
8. Cockman, T. (1833). Cicero’s The offices. New York : J. & J. Harper.
9. Cockman, T. (1839). Cicero’s The offices. New York : Harer & Brothers.
10. Editors. (2007). Cicero on the ethics of information asymmetry. Journal of Political Economy, 115(4), p 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/523904<a href=https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/523904 target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/523904</a>
11. Eliot, T. S. (1934). The rock. London: Faber & Faber.
12. Erickson, T. (2009). Knowledge management. New Delhi: Global Vision Publishing House.
13. Faccarello, G., & Kurz, H. D. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook on the history of economic analysis (Vol. II). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
14. Fleming, N. D. (1996). Coping with a revolution : Will the internet change earning ? (Occasional Paper for Faculty). Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.vark-learn.com/documents/Information_and_knowledge.pdf target="_blank">http://www.vark-learn.com/documents/Information_and_knowledge.pdf</a>
15. Foldvary, F. E. (2013, June 17). Do markets promote immoral behavior? Fee. Retrieved from <a href=https://fee.org/articles/how-markets-promote-moral-behavior/ target="_blank">https://fee.org/articles/how-markets-promote-moral-behavior/</a>
16. Gorga, C. (2015). Economics of morality: Economics of Moses, economics of Jesus. Mother Pelican: A Journal of Solidarity and Sustainability, 11(4). Retrieved from <a href=https://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv11n04page3.html target="_blank">https://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv11n04page3.html</a>
17. Griffin, M. T., & Atkins, E. M. (eds.) (1991). Cicero On duties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hazlitt, F., & Hazlitt, H. (1984). The wisdom of the stoics : Selections from Seneca, Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius. London : University Press of America.
19. Jeadan, C. (n.d.). The pitfalls of following nature: Stoic appeals to nature as a normative guideline. Retrieved from <a href=https://www.ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/5dbf target="_blank">https://www.ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/5dbf</a>
20. Lombardo, T. (2012). Wisdom, consciousness and the future. Mother Pelican: A Journal of Solidarity and Sustainability, 8(1). Retrieved from <a href=http://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv08n01page6.html target="_blank">http://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv08n01page6.html</a>
21. Maddala, G. S., & Miller, E. M. (1989). Microeconomics: Theory and applications. New York and New Delhi: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
22. Menon, R. (2012, June 13). Markets and governments: A historical perspective. The Globalist. Retrieved from <a href=https://www.theglobalist.com/markets-and-governments-a-historical-perspective/ target="_blank">https://www.theglobalist.com/markets-and-governments-a-historical-perspective/</a>
23. Miller, W. (1913). Cicero De officiis. London : William Heinemann Ltd. and New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
24. Peabody, A. P. (1887). Ethical writings of Cicero: De officiis; De senectute; De amitica, and Scipio’s dream. Boston : Little, Brown & Co.
25. Prasad, M. (1999). The morality of market exchange: Love, money, and contractual justice. Sociological Perspectives, 42(2), 181-213.
26. Robinson, J. C. (2001). The end of asymmetric information. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 26(5), 1045-1053.
27. Rosser, Jr. J. B. (2003). A Nobel Prize for asymmetric information: The economic contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence, and Joseph Stiglitz. Review of Political Economy, 15(1), 3-21.
28. Segura, J., & Braun, C. R. (eds.) (2004). An eponymous dictionary of economics: A guide to laws and theorems named after economists. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
29. Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213-225.
30. Stigler, S. M. (1980). Stigler’s law of eponymy. Transaction of the New York Academy of Sciences, 39(1), 147-157.