Purpose : The paper aimed to investigate female participation in paid employment across states in urban regions of India. We examined whether supply-side issues were the primary cause of the low and stable female participation rate in urban areas using data from the Indian Human Development Survey II (2011–2012).

Methodology : We employed logistic regression to examine the influence of supply-side determinants on women’s participation in paid employment in metropolitan areas because the dependent variable is dichotomous. For analysis, Stata18 was utilized.

Findings : It was found that only 22–23% of females participated in paid employment activities despite urban residence. The participation of married females across the working age group of 25–59 years was the lowest compared to unmarried females, separated/divorced, and widowed. The participation of graduate females in states with high urbanization rates was lower.

Practical Implications : We recommended that legislators concentrate on creating laws that offer high-quality employment opportunities to women with a range of educational backgrounds and skill levels. Traditional social conventions that discourage women from pursuing job possibilities can be changed with the support of a shift in family beliefs around gender roles. Encouraging more female participation may require reducing the care load by offering reasonably priced childcare facilities.

Originality : The present paper has highlighted the stagnation of female participation in the labor market in urban regions of India, which has not been extensively covered in the broader literature.

1. Afridi, F., Bishnu, M., & Mahajan, K. (2019). What determines women's labor supply? The role of home productivity and social norms (IZA DP No. 12666). IZA Institute of Labour Economics.
2. Andres, L. A., Dasgupta, B., Joseph, G., Abraham, V., & Correia, M. (2017). Precarious drop: Reassessing patterns of female labor force participation in India. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2948511
3. Bhalotra, S., Clarke, D., & Walther, S. (2023). Women's careers and family formation. In K. F. Zimmermann (ed.), Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics (pp. 1–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_150-1
4. Chatterjee, E., Desai, S., & Vanneman, R. (2018). Indian paradox: Rising education, declining women's employment. Demographic Research, 38, 855–878. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.31
5. Das, M. B., & Zumbyte, I. (2017). The motherhood penalty and female employment in urban India (Policy Research Working Paper No. 8004). World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8004
6. Das, S., Jain-Chandra, S., Kochhar, K., & Kumar, N. (2015). Women workers in India: Why so few among so many (IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/55). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp1555.pdf
7. Desai, S., & Joshi, O. (2019). The paradox of declining female work participation in an era of economic growth. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 62, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00162-z
8. Fernandez, R. (2013). Cultural change as learning: The evolution of female labour force participation over a century. American Economic Review, 103(1), 472–500. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.472
9. Ghai, S. (2018). The anomaly of women's work and education in India (Working Paper No. 368). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/203702
10. Jayachandran, S. (2020). Social norms as a barrier to women's employment in developing countries (NBER Working Paper No. 27449). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27449
11. Kanjilal-Bhaduri, S., & Pastore, F. (2018). Returns to education and female participation nexus: Evidence from India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 61(3), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-018-0143-2
12. Kapsos, S., Silbermann, A., & Bourmpoula, E. (2014). Why is female labour force participation declining so sharply in India? (ILO Research Paper no. 10) (pp. 1–51). International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@inst/documents/publication/wcms_250977.pdf
13. Khan, M. (2018). Determinants of Muslim female participation in the labour force. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 7(5), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2018/v7i5/139926
14. Klasen, S. (2019). What explains uneven female labour force participation levels and trends in developing countries? The World Bank Research Observer, 34(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkz005
15. Klasen, S., & Pieters, J. (2015). What explains the stagnation of female labour force participation in urban India? The World Bank Economic Review, 29(3), 449–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhv003
16. Parvathy, P., & Kavitha, A. C. (2023). Influence of individual and household characteristics on unpaid work of women-An exposition of the case of Malayali women. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 12(4), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2023/v12i4/173306
17. Reed, M. (2020). The labor force participation of Indian women before and after widowhood. Demographic Research, 43(24), 673–706. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2020.43.24
18. Tayal, D., & Paul, S. (2021). Labour force participation rate of women in urban India: An age Cohort-Wise analysis. The Indian Society of Labour Economics, 64, 565–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-021-00336-8