This paper is based on a primary survey that explored if changes in income have any interconnection with regular and disciplined savings behavior. A review of the existing literature on the subject enables an understanding of the definition of low-income households and the socioeconomic characteristics that decide the savings behavior of low-income households. This research also explored the common reasons for changes in income to understand the impact on the consumption-saving base of a low-income household. For the survey and primary data collection, respondents were selected from one low-GDP per capita state and one high - GDP per capita state. During the survey, the respondents from low-income households filled out a questionnaire on their socioeconomic status and financial behavior. From amongst a variety of other questions and a range of responses, they were asked if they had been regular in their habit of monthly savings. Here, the primary goal was to gauge if the respondents had understood the importance of being regular or consistent in their savings investment behavior. Having segregated the information on income and regularity of savings, a cross-tabulation and a dummy coding regression were conducted to find the magnitude, direction of the regression coefficient, and whether the coefficients’ values were significant. These tests were conducted through the SPSS software, and the findings were recorded and analyzed. Upon finding the values positive and relationship significant, it was inferred that if low-income households would observe the trends of their income falling or rising, they could be more regular in savings, even if the amount they saved was less. This research fills the gap within existing scholarship in the field that focuses on the volume or amount of savings. By highlighting the importance of consciously observing households’ income and emphasizing consistency in savings behavior, this research opens up areas of further inquiry that seek to aid public policy aimed at the target group.

1. Beverly, S. G., & Sherraden, M. (1999). Institutional determinants of saving: Implications for low-income households and public policy. The Journal of Socio-Economics , 28 (4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-5357(99)00046-3
2. Cesaratto, S. (1999). Critical survey. Savings and economic growth in neoclassical theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(6), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.6.771
3. Deaton,A.(1991) . Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, 59 ( 5 ) , 1221– 1248 . https://doi.org/10.2307/2938366
4. Kennickell, A. B., & Starr-Mccluer, M. (1997). Household saving and portfolio change : Evidence from the 1983–89 SCF panel. The Review of Income and Wealth, 43(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1997.tb00232.x
5. Keynes, J. M. (2018). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Springer Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70344-2
6. Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. (2012, September). Report of the technical group on urban housing shortage (TG-12)(2012–2017). Government of India. http://nbo.nic.in/pdf/urban-housing-shortage.pdf
7. National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector. (2007, August). Report on conditions of work and promotion of livelihoods in the unorganised sector. Government of India . https://dcmsme.gov.in/Condition_of_workers_sep_2007.pdf
8. Sonam, Aggarwal, S., & Bhushan, V. (2019). Impact analysis of the SHG-bank linkage model on empowerment of women in Dehradun. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 8(3), 20 – 31. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2019/v8i3/146034
9. Shin, S. H., & Kim, K. T. (2018). Perceived income changes, saving motives, and household savings. Journal of
10. Financial Counseling and Planning, 29(2), 396 – 409. https://doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.29.2.396
11. Sreenivas, N., & Subramanya Sarma, V. V. (2012). Microfinance: The sour grape. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 1(3), 38 – 48. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2012/v1i3/54527
12. Swami, M. (2014). Impact analysis of SHGs in the urban milieu: A case study. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 3(1), 4 –14. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2014/v3i1/55916