Purpose : The paper explored the prevalent need for interdisciplinary research; the current gap in interdisciplinary research funding in India, and the resulting insufficiency in both the volume of interdisciplinary research and the production of applicable research output in India.

Methodology : The paper conducted descriptive research to explore the impact of a paucity of funding for interdisciplinary research on India’s intellectual performance. The information required for the study was collected from the websites of research funding agencies in India. For national and global comparisons, data was collected from articles published in reputed journals and published reports of the National Science Board (NSB) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

Findings : The study found that despite publishing a respectable number of articles, India demonstrated a less-than-expected volume of applicable research output compared to China, Japan, and the United States of America. It also found that the percentage of interdisciplinary research proposals approved and funded in India was quite minuscule. However, the study did not delve into analytical methods to establish these facts.

Practical Implications : The study recommended that the existing peer review system must be critically examined to ensure more funding for interdisciplinary research. It also recommended that interdisciplinary research be funded by established businesses that require innovative solutions so that the collaborations are tailored to fit the defined objectives and, therefore, generate applicable outputs.

Originality : The paper delved into a relatively under-researched, albeit currently relevant area, and reported interesting findings that will trigger future research.

1. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637–676. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27750730
2. Bammer, G. (2012). Strengthening interdisciplinary research: What it is, what it does, how it does it & how it is supported. The Australian Council of Learned Academies. https://acola.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/strengthening-interdisciplinary-research.pdf
3. Blackwell, A. F., Wilson, L., Street, A., Boulton, C., & Knell, J. (2009). Radical innovation: Crossing knowledge boundaries with interdisciplinary teams (Report No. UCAM-CL-TR-760). University of Cambridge. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-760.pdf
4. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2006). Open science and university patenting: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian case. In C. Peeters & de la Potterie, B. (eds), Economic and management perspectives on intellectual property rights (pp. 83–103). Applied Econometrics Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504745_5
5. Bridle, H., Vrieling, A., Cardillo, M., Araya, Y., & Hinojosa, L. (2013). Preparing for an interdisciplinary future: A perspective from early-career researchers. Futures, 53, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.09.003
6. Brown, R., Werbeloff, L., & Raven, R. (2019). Interdisciplinary research and impact. Global Challenges, 3(4), Article ID 1900020. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201900020
7. Corbacho, A.M., Minini, L., Pereyra, M., González-Fernández, A. E., Echániz, R., Repetto, L. Cruz, P., Fernández-Damonte, V., Lorieto, A., & Basile, M. (2021). Interdisciplinary higher education with a focus on academic motivation and teamwork diversity. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100062, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100062
8. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India. (n.d.). R&D projects of CSIR. https://www.csir.res.in/rd-projects-csir
9. Das, K., & Paital, B. (2021). Future call for policy making to speed up interdisciplinarity between natural and social sciences and humanities in countries such as India. Heliyon, 7, Article ID e06484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06484
10. Defence Research & Development Organisation, Ministry of Defence, Government of India. (n.d.). Research boards. https://www.drdo.gov.in/research-board
11. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.a.). R&D – Environmental surveillance and radiation protection. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://www.barc.gov.in/randd/erm.html
12. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.b.). R&D - Material sciences & engineering. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://www.barc.gov.in/randd/mse.html
13. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.c.). R&D – Reprocessing and nuclear waste management. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://www.barc.gov.in/randd/rwm.html
14. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.d.). R&D - Chemical & radiochemical sciences. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://www.barc.gov.in/randd/chemical_sc.html
15. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.e.). R&D - Chemical engineering & technology. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://www.barc.gov.in/randd/cet.html
16. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.f.). R&D - Electronics instrumentation & computers. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://www.barc.gov.in/randd/eic.html
17. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.g.). R&D - Physical sciences. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://www.barc.gov.in/randd/physical_sc.html
18. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. (n.d.h). Technology transfer & collaboration division. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. https://technologies.britatom.gov.in/
19. Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Schemes. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/schemes
20. Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology. (n.d.a.). Sanctioned projects. https://dst.gov.in/sanctioned-projects
21. Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology. (n.d.b.). Scheduled Caste sub plan (SCSP) for F.Y. 2020–21. https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/Scheduled%20Caste%20Sub%20Plan%20%28SCSP%29%20for%20F.Y.%202020-21.pdf
22. Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology. (n.d.c.). Tribal sub-plan (SCSP) for F.Y. 2020-21. https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/Tribal%20Sub%20Plan%20%28TSP%29%20for%20F.Y.%202020-21.pdf
23. Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology. (n.d.d.). STW data 2020–21. https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/STW%20data%202020-21.pdf#_blank
24. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (n.d.). Current projects and programmes. https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/programmlisten?language=en#PROGRAMM=Research%20Units&VARIANTE=Advanced%20Studies%20Centres%20in%20SSH
25. Dzeng, E. (2013, March 15). How to inspire interdisciplinarity: Lessons from the collegiate system. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/mar/15/interdisciplinary-academic-universities-research
26. Elnahas, M. (2010). Interdisciplinarity for innovation: A case study in architecture. In Curiouser: The 2010 Joint Meeting of SECAC and MACAA. Commonwealth University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260784663
27. Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
28. Gleed, A., & Merchant, D. (2016). Interdisciplinarity: Survey report for the Global Research Council 2016 Annual Meeting [technical report]. DJS Research. https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-grc/data/5th/Survey_Report_on_Interdisciplinarity_for_GRC_DJS_Research.pdf
29. Jones, C. (2010). Interdisciplinary approach - Advantages, disadvantages, and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. ESSAI, 7, Article no. 26, 76–81. http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol7/iss1/26
30. Kateb, S., Ruehle, R. C., Kroon, D. P., van Burg, E., & Huber, M. (2022). Innovating under pressure: Adopting digital technologies in social care organizations during the COVID-19 crisis. Technovation, 115, Article ID 102536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102536
31. Konar, A. K. (2019). How interdisciplinary is interdisciplinary economics? Arthshashtra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 8(6), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2019/v8i6/150839
32. König, T., & Gorman, M. E. (2017). The challenge of funding interdisciplinary research: A look inside public research funding agencies. In R. Frodeman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed., pp. 513–524). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.41
33. Lepore, D., Dolui, K., Tomashchuk, O., Shim, H., Puri, C., Li, Y., Chen, N., & Spigarelli, F. (2023). Interdisciplinary research unlocking innovative solutions in healthcare. Technovation, 120, Article ID 102511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102511
34. Luukkonen, T., Stampfer, M., & Strassnig, M. (2015). Evaluation practices in the selection of ground-breaking research proposals. Research Gate. https://repository.fteval.at/id/eprint/335/2/Luukkonen_Stampfer_Strassnig_Evaluation_groundbreaking_research_working_paper(1).pdf
35. Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Marsden, W., & Meagher, L. (2011). Key success factors in the quest for interdisciplinary knowledge. ESRC Innogen Centre. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/28965045.pdf
36. Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Marsden, W., & Meagher, L. (2013). The role of funding agencies in creating interdisciplinary knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs121
37. Marsden, W., Lyall, C., Bruce, A., & Meagher, L. (2011). A short guide for funders of interdisciplinary research. Edinburgh Research Explorer. The University of Edinburgh. https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/12623532/A_Short_Guide_for_Funders_of_Interdisciplinary_Research.pdf
38. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. (n.d.). Scheme on environment research and development programme (ERDP). Government of India. https://repmismoef.nic.in/Public/Home1.aspx
39. Mousazadeh, M., Paital, B., Naghdali, Z., Mortezania, Z., Hashemi, M., Niaragh, E. K., Aghababaei, M., Ghorbankhani, M., Lichtfouse, E., Sillanpää, M., Hashim, K. S., & Emamjomeh, M. M. (2021). Positive environmental effects of the coronavirus 2020 episode: A review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 12738–12760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01240-3
40. Mukherjee, D., Arora, N., & Nath, S. C. (2022). Exploring failure orientation: Its mediating role in multidisciplinary teams of the Petroleum Industry. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(12), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i12/172599
41. Poege, F., Harhoff, D., Gaessler, F., & Baruffaldi, S. (2019). Science quality and the value of inventions. Science Advances, 5(12), Article eaay7323. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay7323
42. Science and Engineering Research Board. (n.d.a). Research support. https://prism.serbonline.in/ResearchSupport
43. Science and Engineering Research Board. (n.d.b). SERB – Project information system and management. https://prism.serbonline.in/
44. Somasundaram, S. (2025). List of research funding agencies in India 2025. iLovePhD. https://www.ilovephd.com/research-funding-agencies-in-india/
45. The Royal Society. (2010). The scientific century: Securing our future prosperity. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/royal_society_content/policy/publications/2010/4294970126.pdf
46. UK-India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI). (n.d.). Research and innovation. http://ukieri.org/journey/innovation-briefs
47. van Zeebroeck, N. V., de la Potterie, B., & Guellec, D. (2008). Patents and academic research: A state of the art. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810870328
48. White, K. (2021). Publications output: U.S. trends and international comparisons (Report No. NSB-2021-4). National Science Board. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20214
49. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Statistical country profiles. https://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/country_profile/
50. World Intellectual Property Report. (2019). The geography of innovation: Local hotspots, global networks. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_944_2019.pdf
51. Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 93(23), 12709–12716. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.12709