New AIJER now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
UGC-CARE Group I Google Scholar |
Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research logo

Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research

ISSN: 2278-1811 Frequency: Quarterly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2012 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: UGC-CARE Group I Google Scholar J-Gate

India - South Africa Merchandise Trade: Export Prospects

Open Access Original Article

India - South Africa Merchandise Trade: Export Prospects

Rajender Kumar1,  Vandana Sehgal Arora2

1 Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology (NIT), Kurukshetra-136 119, Haryana

2 Assistant Professor, Amity Law School, Delhi

Volume 4
Issue 1
Pages 31–50
Year 2015
Received: Sept. 24, 2014 Accepted: Jan. 4, 2015 Published: Feb. 1, 2015
Abstract

In recent years, India's trade with the African region has grown enormously, especially with South Africa, indicating the existence of a huge untapped trade potential for economic cooperation. The trend in total trade has shown the significant rise in both India's exports to and also India's imports from South Africa, with the imports having risen faster than the exports. The study provided an in-depth analysis of competitiveness of Indian exports at different time points (1991, 1996, 2001, 2006, and 2012) using SITC 3-digit product category level and links this analysis of Indian export potential to South Africa. The RCA was also estimated for import of South Africa for the latest study period (2012) to identify the commodities where South Africa enjoys an advantage to import from any country in the world. The study revealed that heavy petrol/bitum oils and zinc have a lower trade rank (traded more) than spices and synthetic organic colour agents (traded less) despite the fact that they are highly advantageous traded commodities, where both India has an advantage to export and South Africa has an advantage to import. Similarly, tea and mate, cine fild developed, natural abrasives n.e.s, are more advantageous to trade against rolled plated m-steel, footwear, rubber tyres/treads. To enhance trade complementarities with South Africa, India should diversify its exports in these product lines also. By focusing on these areas, the gains from trade can be maximized.

Keywords Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) International Trade Opportunities Trade Complementarities
How to Cite

Rajender Kumar, Vandana Sehgal Arora (2015). India - South Africa Merchandise Trade: Export Prospects. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 4(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2015/v4i1/58941

References
  1. Bagaria, N., Santra, S., & Kumar, R. (2014). A study on variation in comparative advantage in trade between China and India. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 2 (1), 101-107.
  2. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and 'revealed' comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33 (2), 99-123.
  3. Batra, A., & Khan, Z. (2005). Revealed comparative advantage: An analysis for India and China (Working Paper No. 168, pp. 5-9, pp. 48-49). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).
  4. Burange, L.G., & Chaddha, S. J. (2008). India's revealed comparative advantage in merchandise trade (Working Paper UDE 28/06/2008, pp. 6-14). Department of Economics, University of Mumbai, Mumbai.
  5. Chandran, S. (2010). Trade complementarity and similarity between India and Asean countries in the context of the RTA (MPRA Paper No. 29279, pp. 3-6). Retrieved from <a href=http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29279/ target="_blank">http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29279/</a>.
  6. Das, P. K., & Pradhan, S. R. (2014). India-gulf trade relations. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 4(1), 31-41.
  7. Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry. (2009). Foreign trade policy (FTP), 2009-2014. Retrieved from <a href=http://pib.nic.in/archieve/ForeignTradePolicy/ForeignTradePolicy.pdf target="_blank">http://pib.nic.in/archieve/ForeignTradePolicy/ForeignTradePolicy.pdf</a>.
  8. Puri, L. (2007). IBSA: An emerging trinity in the new geography of international trade. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities. Study Series No. 35, pp. 9-13.
  9. Siwach, M., & Nanda, S. (2012). Indo U.S. merchandise trade: Export prospects. Excel International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 2 (7), 251-253.
  10. World Bank (n.d.). World integrated trade solution (WITS Database). Retrieved from <a href=http://wits.worldbank.org target="_blank">http://wits.worldbank.org</a>.
  11. Yunus, M. M., Mohamed, Z., Mahyideen, J. M., & Saidon, R. (2010). Revealed comparative advantage of Malaysian manufacturing: Malaysia and Singapore. Proceedings of Fifth Malaysian National Economic Conference, PERKEM V, JILID Vol. 1, pp.278-288. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.ukm.my/fep/perkem/pdf/perkemV/PERKEM2010-l-27.pdf target="_blank">http://www.ukm.my/fep/perkem/pdf/perkemV/PERKEM2010-l-27.pdf</a>
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to AIJER

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines