New AIJER now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
UGC-CARE Group I Google Scholar |
Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research logo

Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research

ISSN: 2278-1811 Frequency: Quarterly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2012 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: UGC-CARE Group I Google Scholar J-Gate

Technical Efficiency of Urban Public Transport Undertakings in India: A Study with Special Reference to CSTC

Open Access Original Article

Technical Efficiency of Urban Public Transport Undertakings in India: A Study with Special Reference to CSTC

Aparajita Chakrabartty1,  Sudakshina Gupta2

1 Junior Research Fellow, Centre for Urban Economic Studies, Department of Economics University of Calcutta 1, Reformatory Street Kolkata - 700 027

2 Associate Professor, Centre for Urban Economic Studies, Department of Economics 1, Reformatory Street, University of Calcutta Kolkata - 700 027

Volume 4
Issue 3
Pages 20–32
Year 2015
Received: Sept. 29, 2014 Accepted: June 2, 2015 Published: June 1, 2015
Abstract

In most of the big cities in India, buses are mainly run by publicly owned State Transport Undertakings (STUs), many of which make losses due to some social obligations to be fulfilled. In this paper, the values of certain performance indicators showed that some undertakings were in a much better position as compared to others. The Calcutta State Transport Corporation (CSTC) in the state of West Bengal, one of the oldest STUs in India, exhibited quite a dismal performance. In such a scenario, a comparison was made between the technical efficiencies of CSTC and a few other STUs of India using stochastic frontier analysis. CSTC was found to have a very low technical efficiency, corroborating the results obtained in terms of the performance indicators.

Keywords State Transport Undertakings Performance Indicators Technical Efficiency Stochastic Frontier Analysis
How to Cite

Aparajita Chakrabartty, Sudakshina Gupta (2015). Technical Efficiency of Urban Public Transport Undertakings in India: A Study with Special Reference to CSTC. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 4(3), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2015/v4i3/71377

References
  1. Agarwal,P. K., & Singh, A. P. (2010). Performance improvement of urban bus system: Issues and solution. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2 (9), 4759-4766.
  2. Aigner, D.J., & Chu, S.F. (1968). On estimating the industry production function. American Economic Review, 58, 826-839.
  3. Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A.K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6 (1), 21-37.
  4. Association of State Road Transport Undertakings. (2002a). The performance of STUs at a glance for the period from 1989 - 90 to 2000- 01. Delhi : ASRTU.
  5. Association of State Road Transport Undertakings. (2002b). STU policy issue. Delhi : ASRTU.
  6. Barbot, C., Costa, A., & Sochira, E. (2008). Airlines performance in the new market context: A comparative productivity and efficiency analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14 (5), 270-274. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2008.05.003
  7. Barros, C. P., & Peypoch, N. (2009). An evaluation of European airlines' operational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 122 (2), 525-533.
  8. Battese, G.E., & Coelli, T.J. (1988). Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 38 (3), 387-399.
  9. Bhadra, D. (2009). Race to the bottom or swimming upstream: Performance analysis of US airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 15 (5), 227-235.
  10. Central Institute of Road Transport (CIRT). (Various Years). State transport undertakings : Profile and performance (Various Issues). Pune : Central Institute of Road Transport.
  11. Coelli, T., Rao, D. S. P., O Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (Second Edition, pp. 135 - 259). USA : Springer.
  12. De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., & Costa, A. (2002). Public transport performance: What does one learn from frontier studies? Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 22 (1), 1 - 38. DOI:10.1080/01441640010020313
  13. Deb, K. & Sundar, S. (2001). Restructuring urban public transport in India. New Delhi : The Energy and Research Institute, New Delhi Retrieved from <a href=http://www.codatu.org/wp-content/uploads/Restructuring-urban-public-transport-in-India-Kaushik-DEB-Sanjivi-SUNDAR.pdf target="_blank">http://www.codatu.org/wp-content/uploads/Restructuring-urban-public-transport-in-India-Kaushik-DEB-Sanjivi-SUNDAR.pdf</a>
  14. Deb, K. (2008). Efficiency, demand, and pricing of public bus transport in India. ETH Retrieved from <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005648162 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005648162</a>
  15. Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19 (3), 273-292. DOI: 10.2307/1906814
  16. Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120 (3), 253-290.
  17. Fielding, G. J., et al. (1977). Development of performance indicators for transit. Irvine. UC/PT, Inc., and APTA. Proceedings of the first National Conference on Transit Performance, Norfolk, Virginia, Washington, D. C.
  18. Gowda, J. M. (1999). Implications of concessional travel facility on the commercial viability of SRTCs in India. India Journal of Transport Management, 149-157.
  19. Gupta, S., & Mukherjee. A, (2013). Utilization of passenger transport subsidy in Kolkata: A case study of Calcutta State Transport Corporation. Research in Transportation Economics, 38(1), 3-10. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.011
  20. Gupta, S. (2007). Passenger transport subsidy in West Bengal: Use or misuse. Delhi : Manak Publications.
  21. Hirschhausen, C., & Cullman, A. (2010). A nonparametric efficiency analysis of German public transport companies. Transportation Research Part E : Logistics and Transportation Review, 46 (3), 436-445. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2009.11.005
  22. Holmgren, J. (2012). The efficiency of public transport operations - An evaluation using stochastic frontier analysis. Research in Transportation Economics, 39 (1), 50-57. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.023
  23. Jondrow, J., Lovell, C.A.K., Materov, I.S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19, 233-238.
  24. Koopmans, T.C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T.C. Koopmans, (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation, Cowles commission for research in economics (Monograph No. 13). New York : Wiley.
  25. Kumbhakar, S. C., & Knox Lovell, C. A. (2003). Stochastic frontier analysis (pp. 89-130). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  26. Lin, E. T. J., Lan, L. W., & Chiu, A. K. Y. (2010). Measuring transport efficiency with adjustment of accidents: Case of Tapei bus transit. Transportmetrica, 6 (2), 79 - 96. DOI:10.1080/18128600802630265
  27. Marwah, B.R., Sibal, V.K., & Sawant, S. (2001). Bus transport in Delhi. In S. Morris (Ed.), India infrastructure report. New Delhi : Oxford University Press.
  28. Meeusen, W., & Broeck, J. V. D. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18 (2), 435- 444.
  29. Merkert, R., & Hensher, D. A. (2011). The impact of strategic management and fleet planning on airline efficiency: A random effects Tobit model based on DEA efficiency scores. Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 45 (7), 686-695. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.04.015
  30. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. (2003). Road transport. Retrieved from <a href=http://mospi.nic.in/mospi_new/upload/Infra_stat_2010/1.ch_road.pdf target="_blank">http://mospi.nic.in/mospi_new/upload/Infra_stat_2010/1.ch_road.pdf</a>
  31. Murillo - Zamorano, L. R. (2004). Economic efficiency and frontier techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18 (1), 33 - 77.
  32. Odeck, J.(2008). The effect of mergers on efficiency and productivity of public transport services. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42 (4), 696-708.
  33. Pendakur, V.S. (2002). A policy perspective for sustainable cities: Non- motorized transport in Asia. Vancouver, Canada : University of British Columbia.
  34. Planning Commission, Government of India. (2002). 10th five year plan (2002-2007)-Volume II: Sectoral policies and programmes. New Delhi : Planning Comission, Government of India.
  35. Population Census. (2011). Retrieved from <a href=http://www.census2011.co.in target="_blank">http://www.census2011.co.in</a>
  36. Prakash, V., Rajesh, J., & Thilagam, M. (2012). Technical efficiency of state road transport undertakings in India : Data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Productivity Management and Assessment, 1 (2), 31-42.
  37. Pucher, J., Korattyswaropam, N., Mittal, N., & Ittyerah, N. (2005). Urban transport crisis in India. Transport Policy, 12, 185-198.
  38. Ramanathan, R., & Parikh J. K. (1999). Transport sector in India: An analysis in the context of sustainable development. Transport Policy, 6 (1), 35-45. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00030-4
  39. Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2013). The geography of transport systems. New York : Routledge.
  40. Singh, S. K. (2000). Technical characteristics and efficiency of the Indian state road transport undertakings. Indian Journal of Transport Management, 24 (8), 533-543.
  41. Singh, S. K., & Venkatesh, A. (2004). Comparing efficiency across state transport undertakings: A production frontier approach. Indian Journal of Transport Management, 27 (3), 374-391.
  42. Söderberg, M. (2009). A broad performance benchmark based on citizens' preferences: The case of Swedish public transportation. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80 (4), 579-603. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00399.x
  43. Sreedharan, E. (2003). Need for urban mass transport system for our cities. New Delhi : Press Information Bureau, Government of India.
  44. Tiwari, G. (n.d.). Public transport research challenges in India. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.vref.se/download/18.778e24d112a169fd1c180006152/Tiwari+-+PT+Research+Challenges.pdf target="_blank">http://www.vref.se/download/18.778e24d112a169fd1c180006152/Tiwari+-+PT+Research+Challenges.pdf</a>
  45. World Bank. (2002). India's transport sector: The challenges ahead. Washington, DC : The World Bank.
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to AIJER

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines