Economic Valuation of GM Technology:A Literature Review

Authors

  •   Parul Jain M. Phil Scholar, Centre for International Trade and Development, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi - 110 067

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i3/95424

Keywords:

Economic Benefits

, Genetically Modified Technology

O13

, O33, Q16

Paper Submission Date

, December 20, 2015, Paper sent back for Revision, March 29, 2016, Paper Acceptance Date, June 5, 2016.

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) technology has been part of the agricultural landscape for more than 20 years and has now been adopted on more than 181 million hectares (ha) in both developed countries (47%) and developing countries (53%). This paper is a review of existing literature on economic valuation of GM technology, focusing on the first generation GM varieties. Valuations at the micro and aggregate level are discussed with respect to specific parameter values, and other aspects such as environmental and regulation concerns were identified that can be included in further research so as to ensure more comprehensive results of the economic valuation of the GM technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-01

How to Cite

Jain, P. (2016). Economic Valuation of GM Technology:A Literature Review. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 5(3), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i3/95424

Issue

Section

Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics

References

Basu, A.K., & Qaim, M. (2007). On the adoption of genetically modified seeds in developing countries and the optimal types of government intervention. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 89 (3), 784 - 804. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01005.x

Benbrook, C. M. (2012). Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. – the first sixteen years. Environmental Sciences Europe, 24 (24), 2190-4715. doi: 10.1186/2190-4715-24-24

Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2014). GM crops: Global socioeconomic and environmental impacts 1996 - 2012. Dorchester : PG Economics Limited.

Buckwell, A., Bradley, D., & Brookes, G. (1998). Economics of identity preservation for genetically modified crops : Final Report of a Study of the Food Biotechnology Communication Initiative. Wye College and CEAS Consultants. London, U.K. Retrieved from http://www.ceasc.com/Images/Content/Final%20FBCI%20report%201745.pdf

Demont, M., & Devos, Y. (2008). Regulating coexistence of GM and non-GM crops without jeopardizing economic incentives. Trends in Biotechnology, 26 (7), 353 - 358. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.03.006

Demont, M., & Tollens, E. (2004). First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt maize adoption in Spain. Annals of Applied Biology, 145 (2), 197 - 207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00376.x

Duffy, M. (2001, December). Who benefits from biotechnology? Paper presented at the American Seed Trade Association Meet, Chicago, Illinois, December 5-7, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/duffy/Pages/biotechpaper.pdf

European Commission. (2003). Guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming (Report No. L189). Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/lex/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003H0556:EN:HTML

Falck-Zepeda, J.B., Traxler, G., & Nelson, R.G. (2000). Rent creation and distribution from biotechnology innovations: The case of Bt cotton and herbicide-tolerant soybeans in 1997. Agribusiness, 16 (1), 21–32. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(200024)16:1<21::AID-AGR3>3.0.CO;2-F

Fernandez-Cornejo, J., & Li, J. (2005, July). The impacts of adopting genetically engineered crops in the USA: the case of Bt corn. Paper presented at American Agriculture Economic Association Annual Meet, Providence, RI, July 24-27, 2005 Retrieved from: http://www.ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/19318/1/sp05fe01.pdf

Huang, J., Hu, R., Rozelle, S., Qiao, F., & Pray, C.E. (2002). Transgenic varieties and productivity of smallholder cotton farmers in China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46 (3), 367 - 387. doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.00184

Ismaël, Y., Bennett, R., & Morse, S. (2003). Benefits of Bt cotton use by smallholders farmers in South Africa. AgBioForum, 5 (1), 1-5.

James, C. (2014). Global Status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49, ISAAA: Ithaca, NY. Retrieved from http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/49

Kathage, J., & Qaim, M. (2012). Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (29), 11652-11656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203647109

Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., Tette, J. (1992). A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin, 139, 1-8. Retrieved from http://ucbiotech.org/biotech_info/PDFs/Kovach_2003.pdf

Lichtenberg, E., & Zilberman, D. (1986). The economics of damage control: Why specification matters. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 68 (2), 261– 273. doi: 10.2307/1241427

Marra, M. C., Piggott, N. E., & Sydorovych, O. (2004). The impact of herbicide tolerant crops on North Carolina's farmers (Working Paper). Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC. Retrieved from: https://ag-econ.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/marapr05.pdf

Pray, C.E., Ma, D., Huang, J., & Qiao, F. (2001). Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Development Review, 29 (5), 813 - 825.

Qaim, M. (2009). The economics of genetically modified crops. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 665 - 693. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144203

Qaim, M., & De Janvry, A. (2005). Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: Economic and environmental effects. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 179 - 200. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X04001883

Qaim, M., & Traxler, G. (2005). Roundup ready soybeans in Argentina : Farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agriculture Economics, 32 (1), 73 - 86. doi: 10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00006.x

Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Naik, G., & Zilberman, D. (2006). Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: Insights from India. Applied Economic Perspective Policy, 28 (1), 48 - 58. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00272.x

Roederer, C., Nugent, R., & Wilson, P. (2000). Economic impacts of genetically modified crops on the agri-food sector: A synthesis. Working document, Directorate-General for Agriculture. [EU Commission - Working Document]. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/gmo/gmo.pdf

Santaniello, V., Evenson, R., Zilberman, D., & Carlson, G.A. (2000). Agriculture and intellectual property rights : Economic, institutional and implementation issues in biotechnology. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publications.

Scatasta, S., Wesseler, J.H.H, & Demont, M. (2006). A critical assessment of methods for analysis of social welfare impacts of genetically modified crops : A literature survey (Mansholt Working Paper, 27). Wageningen, the Netherlands : Mansholt Graduate School of Social Sciences.

Traxler, G. (2006) The GMO experience in North and South America. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 2 (1/2), 46 - 64.